AI does more of the making.

I stay responsible for the judgment. I use AI in research, exploration and building. It's only as good as the brief, so most of my effort goes into the research, structure and specs I give it, and into checking what comes back.

Where it fits

Each stage of my process, and who does it. The parts that need judgment about people stay with me.

StageMeAI
ResearchInterviews, observation, synthesisDesk research, summaries (Gemini)
StructureInformation architecture, content model—
DirectionMood boards, design system rules—
ExplorePick and refineWireframe and UI variants (Figma AI)
BuildSpecs for every page and viewFront-end and prototypes (Claude)
ReviewCheck against research, IA and system—

What I check

  1. Against researchDoes it answer the questions users actually asked?
  2. Against structureDoes every page sit where the IA puts it?
  3. Against the systemTokens, components and states, not look-alikes.
  4. Against realityReal data shapes, accessibility, and copy that says what's true.

Where it helps most

Turning a precise spec into a working prototype in hours, so decisions get tested with realistic data instead of argued over mockups.

Where I don't use it

Talking to users, deciding what their answers mean, and deciding what matters. Those stay with me.